About Me

Name: Amicus
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

E-mail from Afghanistan's Frontlines

A great letter with a first-hand perspective, written from a Battalion Commander stationed in Afghanistan to the families of those under his command.

Go here http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/525cf135-3288-4e46-991f-d4724fd594bcm  to read the full letter from Chris Cavoli, CHOSIN 1-32 Battalion Commander.

From the linked post, "If this commander's pride moves you, visit SoldiersAngels and sign up to help a front line soldier, sailor, airman, Marine or Coast Guard:" Or visit treatsfortroops.com or mysoldier.com - all three are good at getting real citizen support to individuals on the front lines.

Please take the time to read this letter.  It should make us all proud to know that so many are making willing sacrifices to better life for Afghans while also making us safer at home. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Reason At All

What are we using to combat terrorist attacks?  No reason at all.  Why do judges uphold dogmatic politically correct arguments de-fanging our government from performing its duty to protect the lives of citizens against foreign attack?  No reason at all.

Johan Goldberg wrote an article http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JonahGoldberg/2006/08/16/screening_for_terrorists_as_nicely_as_possible on our collective refusal to use appropriate profiling techniques to foil airline bombers, and posed this question, "Why is it morally superior to inconvenience old Mormon women of Swedish descent - for no reason at all - as much as young men from Pakistan?"

It seems the answer is - some of us prefer the use of absolutely no reason at all in the pursuit of pure political correctness to actually saving lives.

To prevail against relentless, hate-driven Muslim jihadis, we are going to need to bring all our capacity to reason to bear.  We are going to need to accept the very un-"It's a Small World" idea that in our small world, the overwhelming majority of building & airline & ship & embassy bombers are Mulim males from central & south Asia, then make that reality a PART of our screening process.  Not the one, lone criteria, but part of a short list of things that tip us off that a person may want to take out a plane-load or stadim-full of innocent citizens.

We cannot afford to aimlessly wander through this conflict without thinking.  We must  use experience to inform the most effective way to apply limited monetary and human resources in our fight against those Muslims who wish us dead, for no good reason at all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Arthur Herman on Appeasement

Arthur Herman wrote in the August 16, 2006 New York Post, "We have passed an awful milestone in our history," Winston Churchill said after the Munich agreement was signed. "Do not suppose this is  the end . . . This is only the first sip, the first foretaste, of a bitter cup that will be proffered to us year by year."

Despite the failure of appeasement, Churchill still believed the Western democracies would make the "supreme recovery" and take up the banner for freedom again. The United States and the forces of democracy will recover from this debacle - even with a Democratic Congress in 2006 and a Democratic president in 2008. The reason will not be because Bush's opponents have a better strategy, or a clearer vision, or even a Winston Churchill waiting in the wings. It will be because our enemies will give us no choice.

Less than a year after Munich, Nazi panzers rolled into Poland.   Instead of fighting a short, limited war over Czechoslovakia, the Western democracies ended up fighting a world war, the most destructive in history. The war with the mullahs of Iran is coming. It is only a question of whether it will be at a time or on a ground of our choosing, or theirs - and whether it is fought within the shadow of a mushroom cloud.

We are faced today with yet another example of the toothlessness, of the United Nations and its resolutions.  The ink is barely dry on U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 and it has been violated with no consequence to those doing the violating.

1701 called for a cease-fire conditional on the Lebanese army and UNIFIL (United Nations Intermim Force in Lebanon) entering the area of southern Lebanon between the Litani river and the Lebanon/Israel border AND disarming Hezbollah.  Within a day or two of this agreement, the Lebanese government publicly refused to disarm Hezbollah.  The U.N. is still passing the hat for countries to contribute sufficient resources to create an effective UNIFIL force.

The question raised by these events is:  Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative...how can any reasonable person take the U.N. seriously as a body with any ability to fairly and effectively handle international conflict?  We owe it to our own country to bear in mind the U.N.'s repeated passing of resolutions which are never enforced.  This behavior tells us clearly that we cannot - must not - allow the U.N. to dictate how we handle our national security and the war against Islamofascism.


NOTE: Arthur Herman is the author most recently of "To Rule The Waves: How the British Navy Shaped the Modern World." He is completing a book on Churchill and Gandhi.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why don't we hate them?

 CNN spent considerable time and resources to do some Arab-street reporting. The story? Why "they" hate us. "They" being Muslim extremists. You know, the Muslim extremists who have a nasty new habit of being democratically elected to govern. Hamas is the legitimately elected government of the Palestinian Authority. Hezbollah holds cabinet positions in the Lebanese government - conveniently the Lebanese government has decided it will not disarm Hezbollah in direct contradiction of the U.N. cease-fire resolution.

CNN isn't the first to pose the question. What CNN could be the first to expose is: Why don't we at least have the guts to express a full-throated dislike of these animals who want us dead? Is it really so politically-incorrect to state that we, the U.S. and our allies, are disgusted with misogynistic, fundamentalist Muslim, mass-murdering madmen?

The answer is, judging by CNN's treatment, yes. Let's not focus on those responsible for September 11, 2001, for Theo Van Gogh, for Madrid's March 11, for the attempted blowing-up of multiple airliners on their way from London to the U.S.. Should I go on? I could. Do we need reminding? We act like it.  (For any who need more...the first two WTC bombings, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, the U.S.S. Cole, the U.S. Embassies in Kenya & Tanzania, the Achille Lauro, PanAm at Lockerbie, etc...)

Acknowledging that the preceeding list is only SOME highlights of the long list of murderous acts perpetrated by Muslim extremists. It is high time for CNN to look into the real mystery of this time in history. Why do we not hate those plotting incessantly to kill innocents?

Have we, collectively, passed the warm-fuzzy stage of belief in a world full of "equally valid" cultures and gone rocketing into a twilight zone of self-loathing where an underlying belief that we don't have right to peaceably coexist with those other cultures has taken root in our collective psyche?

The western media has rocketed into that twilight. Luckily, many Americans have not. Those are the Americans who keep baffling the likes of John Kerry, who could never quite fathom, "why am I losing to that *$#%!@^ IDIOT"? Senator Kerry, sir, I have an answer. The American people, 51% at least, aren't cool with laying down to be killed by guys who hope to compel us all to worship their version of Allah or lose our heads. We're not okay with women being wrapped up like spring rolls and denied education, basic civil rights, and subjected to honor killings. May that critical 51% keep showing up, keep standing up, and keep speaking up.

We don't have to hate them. We do have to understand that they have no right to kill because of their hate, no matter what they think. Let the New York Times print THAT headline.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »